Tag Archives: conversation

ADMA Forum 2011

I was asked to give a talk at the ADMA (Australian Direct Marketing Association) Forum last week – a simple ten-minute presentation showing an interesting example where an organisation has used mail as part of their marketing communications.

I could’ve found a big, dimensional mail pack with lots of wow-factor but, let’s face it, not many marketers have the budget to do those. So I looked for a nice, simple example of a letter and envelope. And I came across this one from Zurich Insurance, produced by Publicis Dialogue in London (source: Directory, directnewideas.com).

The copy says:

Dear Miss Philips,

Yours sincerely,

<Customer Relations Guy’s name>

Actually, we’ve got lots to tell you about. But we can’t say anything until you tick this box.

Yes, I’d like to receive information about special offers.

According to the case study, the problem was that 25% of Zurich customers had opted out of receiving marketing communications. This letter convinced 7% of recipients to change their mind and opt back in. A pretty good result.

‘Opting out’ is pretty bad news for marketers, because it’s the customer saying, ‘I don’t want to hear from you anymore’. It’s the end of the conversation, and if the customer ended it, it must not have been that good in the first place.

What many marketers don’t really want to acknowledge is that your starting point is this: People don’t care what you have to say.

As blunt as it sounds, it’s true. People are too time-poor and you’re just one of many  organisations yelling and selling at (potential) customers.

So, what’s the solution? Well, it’s pretty simple – don’t create ‘ads’. An ad is something people avoid. Rather than create ads that try and interrupt or invade people’s lives, create something people seek out and engage with. Now, many people might say, ‘People don’t actually seek out ads do they?’ Yes, they do. Provided they’re good and/or relevant enough.

Howard Gossage, muttered these words during the Madmen era, and they’re probably more relevant now than they’ve ever been:

“People read what interests them, and sometimes it’s an ad.”

For example, take a look at The Old Spice Response campaign.

20 million views in the first three days, 40 million in the first week. Website traffic up by 300%, and sales up by 107% – here is a case a people seriously ‘opting-in’ to a brand.

Now, I’m not suggesting we go and make personalised videos every time we want to talk to a customer but there are some important points we can take on board, whatever medium you use…

  1. Successful brands are not defined by a logo, a typeface and a colour palette. Successful brands are defined by what they do and how they do it.
  2. Successful brands push the boundaries. They don’t play by the rules, they rewrite them.
  3. Let your brand speak like a person (i.e ‘Dear <first name> <last name>, As a valued customer…’ is not speaking like a person).
  4. Provided you’re not delivering bad news, have some fun. Fun is infectious. It’s what people want to interact with. If you have fun making your communications, people will have fun watching, reading or listening to them.

DUSTIN LANE
Brand Strategy | Advertising Concepts | Copywriting

Visit risinggiants.co or dustinlanecreative.com

Is social media really that social?

As a society we’re more connected than ever before. We know what our friends are doing at seemingly any hour of the day. We’ve had a look through their latest holiday photos. We’ve even been able to catch up with that person we haven’t seen or heard of since the last day of school.

But I wonder what impact it’s having on the day-to-day manner in which people interact. Years ago, a colleague of mine made a short film where friends were supposedly ‘catching up’ over a coffee. Instead, they sat in a café and took turns answering their mobile phones and barely even spoke to each other.

Like that short film, I wonder how many people are too busy chatting with cyber friends instead of speaking to real people that may be right in front of them. In a modern family, would it be uncommon to see one parent answering work emails on their Blackberry, the other parent chatting with friends on Facebook, one child checking what their mates are doing on Twitter, and another child having a conversation with someone via SMS?

Look, I’m no luddite. I realise that these ways of communicating have many benefits but is anyone stopping to question if there’s a downside (and no, I’m not talking about bad reception or no Wi-Fi)? I’m talking about face-to-face interaction taking a serious backseat to the digital stuff.

Some people may argue that television was just as interruptive to how families or groups communicated (or didn’t) when it arrived on the scene. However, in defence of television, it is a more communal medium. A group of people all sit around and share the same experience, often using it as the basis of a conversation. And the other thing is that TV (at least how it exists in its current form) is a fairly passive medium. You just sit in front of it, and it all comes to you. It doesn’t take you away into a separate conversation or experience, excluding the other people who may be sitting in the room with you.

For example, I think a person having an ongoing conversation via SMS while other people are in the same room is a little like whispering to someone in the presence of others. When I was a child I was taught that this was rude behaviour because it’s alienating. However, these days, if it’s the same behaviour but uses technology, it’s seemingly appropriate.

These technologies were designed to aid human interaction, not replace it, so the ground rules and basic manners should still remain the same.

So next time you’re using social media or spending time online, just keep in mind that you could be missing out on much more than someone’s status update. Or put another way, you don’t want the only social life you’re living to be a digital one.

DUSTIN LANE
Brand Strategy | Advertising Concepts | Copywriting

Visit risinggiants.co or dustinlanecreative.com